Home » News updates and thoughts » courses » Page 5

Category: courses

Tick Box Training is High Risk

The Law Sign

If you are scheduling low cost training, often internet based self-study training that uses a nothing or just a short tick box questionnaire at the end to validate the learning you may be putting your organisation at risk.

The recent Allay (UK) Ltd v Mr S Gehlen case made it clear that evidencing training in itself does not provide a defence against breach of legislation.

The training has to be effective that is to say management and employees alike have to adhere to legislation and when/if breaches occur action including retraining must take place.

Concrew Training offers courses that cover many key areas including

  • Data Protection, GDPR and PECR
  • Modern Slavery
  • Equality and Diversity
  • Defensible Documentation
  • Equal Pay
  • Redundancy
  • Tupe
  • Social Media rights and responsibilities
  • Grievance and Disciplinary action

Contact us today for more information on our highly effective high value training

Image Credit: The Law by smlp.co.uk used under CC BY 2.0

Post Brexit – Right to Work Checks

Boris Johnson Speaking

Carrying out right to work in the UK checks for European nationals post Brexit.

Employers must continue to carry out right to work checks for all workers before employing them, as was the case prior to Brexit. Employers can continue to use European Economic Area (EEA) and Swiss passports and national identity cards as evidence of an individual’s right to work in the UK until 30 June 2021.

Employers can also use the online checking service to confirm that a candidate has settled or pre-settled status and therefore has the right to work in the UK. However, up to 30 June 2021, candidates do not have to agree to share their status using the online checking service. They can provide their passport or national identity card as an alternative. Governmentguidancesuggests that, up to 30 June 2021, an employer that insists on seeing evidence of settled or pre-settled status risks a complaint of race discrimination.

Following the UK’s departure from the EU on 31 January 2020, a transition period was in place until 31 December 2020. EEA and Swiss nationals who were in the UK before the end of the transition period have until 30 June 2021 to apply for either settled or pre-settled status, which will give them the right to work in the UK.

There is no requirement for employers to carry out retrospective right to work checks for existing EEA and Swiss national employees to confirm that they have settled or pre-settled status. In other words, if an employer has conducted a compliant right to work check for an EEA or Swiss national before 1 January 2021, it does not need to repeat this.

EEA and Swiss nationals entering the UK from 1 January 2021 will not be able to apply for settled or pre-settled status. Because free movement between the UK and the EEA ended on 31 December 2020, they will require a visa to be able to work in the UK under the new immigration system. Therefore, to confirm the right to work of EEA and Swiss nationals arriving in the UK on or after 1 January 2021, employers will need to see evidence of their visa alongside their passport or national identity card.

EEA and Swiss nationals are not required to share their settled or pre-settled status prior to 30 June 2021. This may present an issue for employers with new starters between 1 January and 30 June 2021, as they may not know if the employee was already in the UK before 1 January 2021, and therefore whether they require a visa. Government guidance onright to work checksdoes not address this specific issue.

When does an employer need a sponsor licence?
An employer needs a sponsor licence if it intends to employ a foreign national who requires a UK visa, under certain immigration routes. From 1 January 2021, a new immigration system applies equally to European Economic Area (EEA) nationals (except Irish nationals) and other non-UK nationals. Prior to 1 January 2021, employers needed a sponsor licence to employ foreign nationals from countries outside the EEA under tier 2, or the skilled worker route, and certain other routes of the immigration system. Employers that do not currently have a sponsor licence will need to apply for one if they wish to recruit any non-UK nationals, including those from inside the EEA, under the skilled worker route (and certain other routes) from 1 January 2021.

An employer will not need a sponsor licence to employ an EEA national who has settled or pre-settled status, or to employ an Irish national. When an employer has a sponsor licence it can issue certificates of sponsorship to individual foreign nationals. The individual then uses the certificate to apply for a visa. Employers can sponsor an employee only if the role meets the minimum requirements relating to skills and salary.


What should an employer do if an employee’s application for settled status is not successful?
Employees who are European Economic Area (EEA) or Swiss nationals, who are in the UK prior to the end of the Brexit transition period on 31 December 2020, can apply for settled status, which will give them the right to remain indefinitely in the UK. An applicant who has not been resident in the UK for five years will be granted pre-settled status, which can be converted to settled status after five years’ residence. The deadline for applications for settled or pre-settled status is 30 June 2021.

Settled or pre-settled status can be refused on grounds of eligibility, for example if the individual is not an EEA national (or a qualifying family member) or is not resident in the UK. It can also be refused on grounds of suitability, for example if the individual has been convicted of a particularly serious crime or is deemed to be a threat to public security.

If an application is refused the applicant can apply again at any time up to 30 June 2021, submitting new information or evidence. In some circumstances, the applicant can apply for anadministrative reviewof the decision.

An employer could consider providing an employee with access to legal assistance for a further application or an administrative review. Ultimately, if the employee does not obtain settled or pre-settled status, they will not have the right to work in the UK and will need to apply for immigration permission under an alternative route.

Image Credit:Boris Johnson Brexit Presserby Number 10 used under CC BY-NC-ND 2.0

Coronavirus – Annual Leave, Flexible Working and Holiday Pay

what does furlough mean

Can an employee take annual leave while on furlough?
Government guidance onHoliday entitlement and pay during coronavirus (COVID-19)confirms that furloughed employees can take annual leave, without the furlough period being disrupted.

Employers must pay furloughed employees their normal rate of pay for a period of holiday, rather than any reduced amount they receive during the furlough. They must top up the amount they can claim under the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme.

From 1 July 2020, furloughed employees can work on a flexible, part-time basis for their employer (known as flexible furlough). The employer can claim under the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme for the hours that the employee does not work and is recorded as being on furlough.

HM Revenue and Customs guidanceon the scheme states that, where an employee is flexibly furloughed, “any hours taken as holiday during the claim period should be counted as furloughed hours rather than working hours”.

It goes on to say that employers should not place an employee on furlough simply because they are on holiday for that period. Therefore, an employer’s decision about whether to furlough an employee should not be influenced by any annual leave, but if an employee takes annual leave during a period covered by a flexible furlough arrangement, the employer should record any hours they were due to work as furlough. It can claim for these hours under the scheme, ensuring that it pays the employee their normal rate of pay for the annual leave.

Many employers that have furloughed employees will not be in a financial position to pay them in full during annual leave. These employers can refuse any requests for annual leave during the furlough period by giving therequired notice. Employees will be able to carry over unused leave in some circumstances.

Where an employer can afford to top up the pay of a furloughed employee, it may consider requiring them to take annual leave during the period of furlough.

Whether or not this can be done in compliance with the Working Time Regulations 1998 (SI 1998/1833) remains uncertain.

When does overtime have to be included in holiday pay?
Holiday pay must be calculated based on the employee’s normal pay. Where an employee normally works overtime, this should be included in the calculation of their holiday pay.

Overtime that the employer is contractually obliged to offer and that employees are required to work must always be included in holiday pay.

InBear Scotland Ltd and others v Fulton and others; Hertel (UK) Ltd v Woods and others; Amec Group Ltd v Law and others [2015] IRLR 15 EAT, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) held that regular overtime that is not guaranteed, but that employees are required to work when it is offered, must also be included.

There is no definition setting out how regularly overtime must be worked for it to be included, but the general principle is that pay that is “normally received” should be included in holiday pay. If an employee has worked a settled pattern of overtime over a period, payment for that overtime is pay that they normally receive and must therefore be included in holiday pay.

Where there is no settled pattern of overtime, the employer should calculate average pay over a reference period leading up to the period of annual leave, although the courts have not addressed what a suitable reference period would be.

The Court of Appeal addressed the question of whether overtime that is voluntary must be included in the calculation of holiday pay inEast of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and others [2019] IRLR 798 CA. It held that voluntary overtime must be included if it is part of a pattern of work that is sufficiently regular and settled for payments made in respect of it to amount to normal remuneration. This will be for tribunals to decide on the facts of each case.

The right to be paid for non-guaranteed overtime in holiday pay derives from case law of the European Court of Justice, and so applies only to holiday pay for the four weeks’ minimum annual leave under EU law, not to the additional 1.6 weeks provided for by the Working Time Regulations 1998 (SI 1998/1833).

Employers should decide their policy on how to treat the additional 1.6 weeks’ statutory minimum leave and any additional contractual entitlement but may decide to include pay for overtime in all holiday pay to avoid complicating the administration of payments.

Flexible working requests:
When are employers’ decisions discriminatory? While the law on the right to request flexible working has not changed, employers are likely to be seeing a shift in employees’ expectations around flexible working. Some employees who have been working flexibly for a sustained period during the pandemic may wish to make this arrangement permanent. The employee may be able to show that they have continued to perform to the required level, or even exceeded expectations, with these changes in place. Now more than ever, employers need a strong reason for refusing flexible working requests or could find themselves on the losing end of indirect disability, sex, or age discrimination cases.

Image Credit:What does furlough from a job means on a whiteboardby Jernej Furman
used under CC BY 2.0

Coronavirus – Whistle Blowing and Grievances

The Law Sign

Whistleblowing: Raising concerns about employer’s conduct

The raising of concerns about how an employer is handling workplace issues during the coronavirus pandemic would count as a disclosure.

To be protected under whistleblowing legislation, the worker must be making the disclosure in the reasonable belief that they are doing so in the public interest. This means that a worker who is dismissed (for example put to the top of the list for redundancy) or subjected to a detriment (for example bullied), for raising genuine concerns about their employer’s safe working practices could bring a whistleblowing claim.

Another scenario that could lead to a whistleblowing claim is an employer retaliating against an employee who has raised genuine concerns about its use of the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme.

HM Revenue & Customs has a hotline for reporting misuse of the scheme.

Handling discipline, capability, and grievance procedures

How employers have been handling disciplinary and grievance procedures is sure to be examined by employment tribunals in the next couple of years. Claims are likely to involve:

  • disciplinary action where employees refuse, or fail, to comply with the employer’s COVID-19 rules put in place to reduce the risk of transmission.
  • and the handling of disciplinary, grievance and capability procedures during the pandemic.

Claimants may focus on delays caused by the pandemic tainting a process’s overall fairness, and remote meetings and hearings being conducted unfairly.

Image credit: The Law by smlp.co.uk used under CC BY

Understanding Coronavirus – Health and Safety Employment Law

LAW Sign

Coronavirus (COVID 19) has serious implications for health and safety in the workplace and some potential openings for litigation for the unwary. Our employment law courses cover all the latest key issues including:

  • Health and safety: Refusal to attend dangerous workplace.
  • Health and safety duties towards pregnant workers

Health and safety: Refusal to attend dangerous workplace.
Employees are required to obey their employer’s reasonable instructions. However, employees are protected against detriment or dismissal where, in “circumstances of danger” that they reasonably believe to be “serious and imminent“, they leave their workplace or refuse to return. There must be actual “circumstances of danger” and the employee must also “reasonably believe” that the danger is “serious and imminent”. Coronavirus-related employment tribunal claims for detriment or dismissal following a refusal to attend work are likely to revolve around whether the claimant’s belief in “imminent and serious” danger was reasonable, depending on the safe working practices the employer put in place.

Health and safety duties towards pregnant workers
While employers have a duty to look after the health and safety of every worker, they have additional obligations in relation to pregnant workers. Employers that fail to fulfil these obligations could face pregnancy and maternity discrimination claims. When maintaining safe working practices during the coronavirus pandemic, employers should ensure that:

  • the risks to pregnant workers are assessed individually; and
  • pregnant workers are consulted about potential adaptations to their role.

Find out more with employment law training course

Image credit: The Law by smlp.co.uk used under CC BY

Understanding Coronavirus and Employment Law

Law Sign

Understanding Coronavirus and Employment Law
Coronavirus (COVID 19) has pushed many businesses to the brink and beyond. In desperate effort to stay afloat staff are being furloughed and laid off. Many more face cuts in hours and pay. As the song goes, “there may be trouble ahead” for those that have rushed in.

Concrew Training’s courses on employment law are bang up to date and cover the latest key issues and challenges including:

  • Selection for furlough: Decision-making to be scrutinised?
  • Redundancy: Selection process and informing and consulting
  • Breach of contract when cutting furloughed employees’ pay.

Selection for furlough: Decision-making to be scrutinised?
There will be employees who are aggrieved at being placed on furlough, particularly where this is accompanied by a pay cut. Equally, there will be employees who would prefer to have been furloughed, but their employer has turned down their request. Normal employment law principles should have been applied to any furlough selection process, so employers may face discrimination claims and arguments that their furlough decision-making has breached the implied term of mutual trust and confidence. While employment tribunals are likely to be sympathetic to employers that have had to make quick decisions, furloughing decisions still need to be as fair and objective as possible.

Redundancy: Selection process and informing and consulting
With many employers having to make large-scale redundancies often with little warning because of coronavirus, will tribunals be inundated with these claims in the next few years? Both individual and collective redundancy issues should feature. Employers need to bear in mind that: > a failure to warn and consult individually with an employee about their proposed redundancy could result in an unfair dismissal claim; and collective consultation obligations are triggered when they are proposing to make redundant 20 or more employees at a single establishment over a period of 90 days or less, and that failure to comply can result in a protective award of up to 90 days’ pay for each affected employee.

Breach of contract when cutting furloughed employees’ pay.
The lack of clarity within the Government’s guidance on agreement to furlough means that there is trouble on the horizon for employers that have unilaterally imposed a pay cut on furloughed employees. For example, the guidance on the extended Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme, states that employers must “have confirmed to their employee (or reached collective agreement with a trade union) in writing” that they have been furloughed, but “the employee does not have to provide a written response”. Strictly speaking, employers that are reducing an employee’s pay to furlough them should have obtained the employee’s explicit written agreement, as this constitutes a variation to their terms and conditions of employment.

Find out more with our employment law training course

The Law by smlp.co.uk used under CC BY

Closed for Christmas

Concrew Training is closed for Christmas, we re-open on Monday 04 January 2021. Urgent email enquiries are still being replied to, but responses may be slower than usual.

Employee Rep Training Online

employee rep meeting

Check out our range of online training modules for employee reps. We cover role, responsibilities and the skills needed to be successful in role.

We also have specialist modules that dovetail with the above to provide technical and operational guidance on issues such as TUPE and Redundancy.

Sample modules can be found here. Contact us for more information

Redundancy Training Online

Redundancy training online

No one likes redundancies but when they have to occur it is imperative that they are managed professionally and all aspects of the law met.

HR teams, Operational Management and Employee reps face real challenges, not just how to meet and manage the complexities of the legislation but how to maintain staff motivation and moral when jobs are at risk.

Concrew Training’s short online training modules provide cost effective support.

find out more here